| Could Robin Hood have existed? How can
the real man be traced? Here are some facts for consideration:
A document of court records was found
in the London public records office dating from 1226. The court records reflect
that a man named Robert Hod fled the jurisdiction of the king's justices,
and his possessions were seized by the Sheriff of York. (In the Middle Ages,
the name Robert was synonymous with Robin.) The document reads that this sheriff
"owes 32 shilling 6 pence of chattels of Rob Hod, fugitive." The Sheriff
of York later became the Sheriff of Nottingham. In 1227, the sheriff still
owed the court the money for Robert Hod's belongings, and the record states
that the same sheriff owed the money. The sheriff told his men to search
for and find this Robert of Weatherby and behead him, calling Robert an "outlaw
and evildoer of our land." Robert Hod was caught and hanged by chain.
Forty years later, another fugitive
was nicknamed Robyn Hod in court records. Rolls of Parliament in 1437 show
a petition for the arrest of Piers Venables of Derbyshire who had resorted
to violence and robbery and taken to the woods "like as it had been Robyn
Hood and his meynie." So the outlaw Robin Hood was used as a title for a
woodland thief and outlaw, even within a generation of Robert Hod in 1226.
Here are some other facts: First, there
was a Robert Hood and his wife Mathilda (who was not from the Fitzwater family)
recorded in the court rolls of Wakefield, England in 1316 and 1317. Second,
the poem A Gest of Robyn Hode was from a press around 1510 and mentions King
Edward II as the reigning monarch at the time of Robin Hood's escapades. There
are records from the court of Edward II dated 1324 reflecting that the king
had a valet of chamber named Robyn Hood, but this man left his service within
a year. So, what are some possibilities?
In tracing the travels of Edward II
during his reign, court records show that he did travel through the area from
April to November 1323, reaching Nottingham in November. At that time, the
king and many barons were fighting over taxes and land, and the Earl of Lancaster
had fought King Edward II in the battle of Boroughbridge in 1322. The Earl
was defeated, and his supporters fled the area to live as outlaws. It is
possible that Robyn Hod was one such supporter.
From March 24 to November 22 1324,
a man named Robyn Hood was a porter of the Chamber of the royal service. So
the possible history is this: Robert Hood of Wakefield was a supporter of
the Earl of Lancaster, who was executed after his defeat in battle. Robert
Hood escaped the rebellion, which made him an outlaw, but by the time Edward
II came to Nottingham in 1323, Robert had resolved these feelings. He became
part of the royal service and was called Robyn Hood. He tired of this work
within a year and returned to Barnsdale in 1324, just outside Wakefield,
when his name no longer appears in the records.
J.C. Holt (1989) pointed to one record
that makes this theory difficult to hang on to: There is a record of the court
paying a porter of the chamber named Robyn Hode on June 27 1323. This would
place his service before Edward II reached Nottingham. It could be that the
Gest is wrong with the dates, Holt contended, but this record stirs up some
question. It seems that these two Robin Hoods, the Wakefield Robin and the
court Robyn, could be separate men. This is the theory that I believe to
be true as well.
Other possibilities of the origins
of Robin Hood have been postulated: The name Robin Hood could have come from
the title to Grandmasters in the witchcult, who wore hoods. The name Robin
was one of the names given to the gods they worshiped, and so the name "Robin
with a Hood" could have come about. Fairies and forest elves wore hoods, and
one fairy name was Robin Goodfellow, and so the name Robin could have been
combined with Hood in mythology. Other writers think that forest bandits
adopted the name, with Robin being a generic name of thiefs and Hood coming
from "O' th' wood." One professor even thinks that Robin was a real man named
Robin Fitzooth and was known by the name Robin Hood.
Men who played parts in Robin Hood
plays often were called the character names that they played, and so some
confusion could come from this. Little John's grave is supposedly at a church
cemetery at Hathersage in Derbyshire, as quoted from a 17th-century text about
a Robert Lockesley who met up with a Little John. The Little John grave is
13 ft. 4 in. long, and in 1795 it was written that the grave was exhumed
and the bones were of an extremely large man. The text also reported that
trouble found the men who had removed the bones until the bones were placed
back in the grave. It could be that this man was chosen as an actor for
Little John because of his size.
There is mention of Robin Hood (Robyne
Hude) and Little John (litill Iohne) in Andrew de Wyntoun's 1420 chronicle
of Scotland through 1408. He mentioned them under the years 1283-85. In the
1440s, Walter Bower continued work on a 1300s piece and cited Robin Hood
(Robert Hood, a famous murderer) and LJ under the year 1266. A third man,
John Major, published a book in 1521 called History of Greater Britain and
cited Robin Hood and Little John from 1193-1194.
There is a grave for Robin Hood in
the area of Kirklees Priory at Yorkshire, England. The story of the epitaph
is interesting: In 1665 a drawing of the grave was made and was published
in 1786 when the word on the grave marker were no longer ledgible. The grave
read "Here lie Roberd Hude, William Goldburgh, Thomas." It is unclear who
William Goldburgh and Thomas are.
A man named Thomas Gale was dean of
York from 1697-1702, and he left in his papers the words that were supposedly
on Robin Hood's grave. The date of death was recorded as 12-24-1247. A similar
epitaph was published at the end of The True Tale of Robin Hood by Martin
Parker, which gives the death date as 12-4-1198.. The Parker epitaph
reads:
Robert Earle of Huntington/Lies under this
little stone./No archer was like him so good;/His wildnesse named him Robbin
Hood./Full thirteene yeares, and something more,/These northerne parts he
vexed sore./Such out-lawes as he and his men/May England never know agen
Here is the Thomas Gale version, written in what more than one researcher
has deemed the old English "muddied" by Gale:
Hear undernead this (dis) laitl stean/Lais
Robert Earl of Huntington (Huntingtun)/Nea arcir ver as hie sae geud/An pipl
kauld im Robin Heud/Sick utlaws as hi an is men/vil England nivr si agen./Obiit
24 Kal. Dekembris 1247.
or in modern English...
Here underneath this little stone/Lies Robert
Earl of Huntington/No archer was as he so good/And people called him Robin
Hood/Such outlaws as he and his men/Will England never see again.
The veracity of these epitaphs has been questioned, but for now,
the stone at the site reflects these words.
All in all, most researchers have agreed
on the likelihood that the man who became Robin Hood was alive under the
reign of Richard I around 1193. I believe that there was a man who was deemed
an outlaw around the end of the 12th century, whose name became Robin Hood
and was used to refer to other outlaws. And so the legend grew...
Believe It or Not!
In Robin Hood: His Life and Legend, Lord Bernard Miles wrote
of this story, which may or may not be true ... you decide!
Two men were sinking a shaft for a coalmine in the 1820s near Bolsover,
England. They uncovered a cave, and searching it, they found that it was
Robin Hood's. Bows, swords, and iron pots were scattered about, and the skeleton
of a man with a crucifix lay up against a wall. These words were written above
the skeleton: "These died that we might live. Requiescant in pace" with a
long list of names below. At the bottom was "I was the last, Michael Tuck."
The cave collapsed after they left, and they were not believed when they
related their story to the townspeople. The cave has not been uncovered since.
|